Home
Firm
Attorneys
Practice Area
Contact
Disclaimer

   Fraud, Misrepresentation/Conspiracy

  

 Azar & Azar represented eight plaintiffs in a series of fraud, misrepresentation/conspiracy lawsuits. The cases were based upon a scheme by the defendants to induce the plaintiffs to purchase pay telephones which were to be set up in certain locations. This was supposed to result in a large return of revenue on plaintiffs investments. It was developed at trial that the whole program was a fraud, misrepresentation/conspiracy. The case was tried in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama (Montgomery, Alabama) and the jury returned separate verdicts for each of the eight plaintiffs in the amount of $3,500,000.00 punitive damages in each case. The jury returned various amounts of compensatory damages for each plaintiff.

Tunnell v. Key-Way, et al. ,
$3,500,000.00 punitive damages; $5,000.00 compensatory damages.

Coldiron v. Key-Way, et al.,
$3,500,000.00 punitive damages; $3,300.00 compensatory damages.

Talley v. Key-Way, et al.,
$3,500,000.00 punitive damages; $5,500.00 compensatory damages.

Johnson v. Key-Way, et al.,
$3,500,000.00 punitive damages; $4,000.00 compensatory damages.

Grubb v. Key-Way, et al.,
$3,500,000.00 punitive damages; $4,600.00 compensatory damages.

Landa v. Key-Way, et al.,
$3,500,000.00 punitive damages; $2,500.00 compensatory damages.

Mann v. Key-Way, et al.,
$3,500,000.00 punitive damages; $3,600.00 compensatory damages.

Kines v. Key-Way, et al.,
$3,500,000.00 punitive damages; $5,500.00 compensatory damages.

 

Image of a gavel.
 

 

 

 

 


Copyright 2005 - 2009© All Rights Reserved   Azar & Azar L.L.C.
No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater

than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.
(Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct rule 7.2(e)(1997))